Computer Network Model And Its Classification Based On Lstm For Identifying Fake Bandwidth

Pengarang

  • Azriel Christian Nurcahyo University of Technology Sarawak
  • Yiiong Siew Ping University of Technology Sarawak
  • Huong Yong Ting University of Technology Sarawak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53840/myjict11-1-250

Kata kunci:

Internet Service Provider, Long Short-Term Memory, Fake Bandwidth, Service Level Agreement

Abstrak

The phenomenon of fake bandwidth arises when the actual internet throughput delivered by an Internet service provider consistently falls below the speed guaranteed in a service level agreement. This study presents a long short-term memory classification framework to identify genuine and fake bandwidth based on real-world network log data collected at the University of Technology Sarawak, Malaysia. The network model was developed following the infrastructure pattern of the campus dedicated bandwidth environment connected to the cybersecurity laboratory. A dataset comprising 1,857,285 log records was acquired over 60 days of continuous monitoring via an RB1100AHx backbone router integrated with a Telegram bot-based real-time notification system. Four bandwidth categories were defined in accordance with ETSI quality standards: Genuine Bandwidth ≥21 Mbps, Fake Bandwidth <15 Mbps, No Heavy Activity <100 kbps, and Unclassified. The LSTM model was optimized through a 100-dimensional embedding layer, a bidirectional LSTM layer with 128 units and progressive dropout regularization (0.4–0.6), and the Adam optimizer at a learning rate of 0.0005. Experiments were conducted under three data split configurations (30:70, 50:50, and 70:30). The model achieved a consistent classification accuracy of 96.93% across all configurations, with an empirical error rate of 3.06%–3.07% and a theoretical generalization bound of 2.87% derived from Vapnik–Chervonenkis theory. K-fold cross-validation yielded a mean accuracy of 0.940, confirming model stability. Empirical analysis reveals that approximately 52% of monitored dedicated bandwidth constitutes genuine throughput, while approximately 23% exhibits fake bandwidth behavior, providing quantitative evidence of systematic SLA non-compliance.

Muat turun

Muat turun data belum tersedia.

Rujukan

Ahmed, R., Mahmood, M. R., & Matin, M. A. (2023). Challenges in meeting QoS requirements toward 6G wireless networks: A state-of-the-art survey. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 34(2), e4693. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4693

Ahmad, N., Alfira, S., Paripurna, C. F., & Fatkhuri. (2025). Corruption in digital transformation: A case study of the impact of misappropriation of Kominfo 4G BTS project funds on e-government governance in Indonesia. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(3), 1046–1057. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum4022

Alfharizi, Z., Karnadi, & Apriansyah. (2026). Analysis of internet network quality of service (QoS) at Yamaha Central Office Palembang using Wireshark. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), 5(2), 3375–3381. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v5i2.2193

Chambers, J. D., Cook, M. J., Burkitt, A. N., & Grayden, D. B. (2024). Using long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks to classify unprocessed EEG for seizure prediction. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1472747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1472747

Dash, N., Chakravarty, S., Rath, A. K., et al. (2025). An optimized LSTM-based deep learning model for anomaly network intrusion detection. Scientific Reports, 15, 1554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85248-z

Edozie, E., Shuaibu, A. N., Sadiq, B. O., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence advances in anomaly detection for telecom networks. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11108-x

El-Hajj, M. (2025). Enhancing communication networks in the new era with artificial intelligence: Techniques, applications, and future directions. Network, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/network5010001

European Telecommunications Standards Institute. (2015). ETSI EG 202 009-3 V1.3.1 (2015-07): User group; Quality of ICT services; Part 3: Template for service level agreements (SLA). ETSI.

European Telecommunications Standards Institute. (2025). ETSI TS 138 300 V18.5.0 (2025-04): 5G; NR; NR and NG-RAN overall description; Stage-2 (3GPP TS 38.300 version 18.5.0 Release 18). ETSI.

Fauzan, M. F., Purwanti, Y., & Suprihadi, D. (2026). Development of a Cisco Packet Tracer-based firewall configuration learning video for vocational high school students. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 13(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v13i1.6330

Gil, P., Garcia, G. J., Delgado, A., Medina, R. M., Calderón, A., & Marti, P. (2014). Computer networks virtualization with GNS3: Evaluating a solution to optimize resources and achieve distance learning. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044343

Güemes-Palau, C., Ferriol-Galmés, M., Paillisse Vilanova, J., López-Brescó, A., Barlet-Ros, P., & Cabellos-Aparicio, A. (2025). Bridging the gap between simulated and real network data using transfer learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00956v2

Hasan, E. F., Alzuod, M. A., Al Jasimee, K. H., Alshdaifat, S. M., Hijazin, A. F., & Khrais, L. T. (2025). The role of organizational culture in digital transformation and modern accounting practices among Jordanian SMEs. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(3), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18030147

Hasan, R., Kamal, M. M., Daowd, A., Eldabi, T., Koliousis, I., & Papadopoulos, T. (2024). Critical analysis of the impact of big data analytics on supply chain operations. Production Planning & Control, 35(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2047237

Javed, H., El-Sappagh, S., & Abuhmed, T. (2025). Robustness in deep learning models for medical diagnostics: Security and adversarial challenges towards robust AI applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11005-9

Johnson, J. M., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019). Survey on deep learning with class imbalance. Journal of Big Data, 6, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0192-5

Keshavarz, H., Mahdzir, A. M., Talebian, H., Jalaliyoon, N., & Ohshima, N. (2021). The value of big data analytics pillars in telecommunication industry. Sustainability, 13(13), 7160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137160

Malashin, I., Tynchenko, V., Gantimurov, A., Nelyub, V., & Borodulin, A. (2024). Applications of long short-term memory (LSTM) networks in polymeric sciences: A review. Polymers, 16(18), 2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182607

Nedyalkov, I. (2023). Application of GNS3 to study the security of data exchange between power electronic devices and control center. Computers, 12(5), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12050101

Nieminen, W., Gebreweld, H., Liuha, A., et al. (2026). Synthetic data for predictive maintenance: A systematic review and framework for Industry 4.0 applications. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-026-02795-6

Nurcahyo, A. C., Huong Yong Ting, & Atanda, A. F. (2025). Network log implementation for GRU-based bandwidth classification. Journal of Computers and Digital Business, 4(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.56427/jcbd.v4i2.763

Nurcahyo, A. C., Yong, A. T. H., & Atanda, A. F. (2024). Classification of simulated fake bandwidth data using LSTM. TEPIAN, 5(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.51967/tepian.v5i3.3106

Nurcahyo, A. C., Yong, T. H., & Atanda, A. F. (2025). Optimisation of network logs for fake bandwidth classification using CNN. TEPIAN, 6(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.51967/tepian.v6i2.3260

Nurfitri Handayani, I., Bayu Permadi, R., Ardhaninggar, E. A., & Fitri Sari, R. (2024). Performance comparison of CC AODV and optimized AODV K-means clustering using NS3. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(5), 1850–1858. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v6i5.1005

Ofcom. (2023, March 23). Future of wireless broadband technologies [PDF]. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/research-and-data/technology-research/2023/future-of-wireless-broadband-technologies.pdf

Pavlov-Kagadejev, M., Jovanovic, L., Bacanin, N., et al. (2024). Optimizing long short-term memory models via metaheuristics for decomposition-aided wind energy generation forecasting. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10678-y

Peykani, P., Ramezanlou, F., Tanasescu, C., & Ghanidel, S. (2025). Large language models: A structured taxonomy and review of challenges, limitations, solutions, and future directions. Applied Sciences, 15(14), 8103. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148103

Prasad, R. (Ed.). (2016). 5G outlook – Innovations and applications (River Publishers Series in Communications and Networking, Vol. 48). River Publishers. https://doi.org/10.13052/rp-9788793379787

QoS (Quality of Service) analysis on internet network (Case study: Universitas Advent Indonesia). (2019). TeIKa, 9(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.36342/teika.v9i01.789

Robitza, W., Ahmad, A., Kara, P. A., et al. (2017). Challenges of future multimedia QoE monitoring for internet service providers. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76, 22243–22266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4870-z

Sabani, A., Farah, M. H., & Dewi, D. R. S. (2019). Indonesia in the spotlight: Combating corruption through ICT enabled governance. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.130

Serrano, W. (2023). Smart or intelligent assets or infrastructure: Technology with a purpose. Buildings, 13(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010131

Sinha, P., Sahu, D., Prakash, S., et al. (2025). A high-performance hybrid LSTM-CNN secure architecture for IoT environments using deep learning. Scientific Reports, 15, 9684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94500-5

Talaei Khoei, T., Ould Slimane, H., & Kaabouch, N. (2023). Deep learning: Systematic review, models, challenges, and research directions. Neural Computing and Applications, 35, 23103–23124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08957-4

Tam, P., Kang, S., Ros, S., & Kim, S. (2023). Enhancing QoS with LSTM-based prediction for congestion-aware aggregation scheduling in edge federated learning. Electronics, 12(17), 3615. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173615

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2021). Digital economy report 2021: Cross-border data flows and development: For whom the data flow (UNCTAD/DER/2021). United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2021_en.pdf

Yilmaz, D., & Büyüktahtakın, İ. E. (2023). Learning optimal solutions via an LSTM-optimization framework. SN Operations Research Forum, 4(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-023-00224-5

Diterbitkan

2026-06-30

Terbitan

Bahagian

Articles

Cara Memetik

Nurcahyo, A. C., Ping, Y. S., & Ting, H. Y. (2026). Computer Network Model And Its Classification Based On Lstm For Identifying Fake Bandwidth. Malaysian Journal of Information and Communication Technology (MyJICT), 11(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.53840/myjict11-1-250

##plugins.generic.shariff.share##