Kajian ke atas Sesi Pembelajaran Kursus Rekabentuk Grafik Secara Dalam Talian Pelajar Multimedia di KUIS
(Study on Online Graphic Design Course Learning Session for Multimedia Students at KUIS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/myjict6-1-78Keywords:
Perception, Multimedia, Online Learning, Graphic Design.Abstract
Pandemik Covid-19 memberi implikasi yang besar kepada kehidupan manusia di seluruh dunia dalam menjalani urusan seharian. Norma baharu harus dilalui dan ia turut melibatkan bidang pendidikan tinggi. Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP) yang antaranya tidak membenarkan sesi pembelajaran dijalankan secara bersemuka menyebabkan institusi pengajian tinggi mengambil langkah menjalankan pembelajaran secara dalam talian (online). Bagi kebanyakan kursus, ia memberi kesan kepada pensyarah dan pelajar memandangkan perjumpaan melalui kaedah maya tidak selancar seperti yang dilakukan secara bersemuka. Kadangkala berlaku gangguan pada capaian internet dan perkakasan yang digunakan. Interaksi melalui video walaupun boleh dilakukan secara langsung tidak dapat menerangkan semua persoalan dengan jelas. Terdapat cadangan agar bahan pembelajaran disediakan secara rakaman dengan medium seperti Google Classroom dan Telegram bagi membolehkan pelajar mengikuti sesi mengikut masa yang sesuai. Mengikut beberapa laporan, Malaysia dianggap belum bersedia untuk menawarkan sistem pembelajaran secara dalam talian sepenuhnya atas beberapa faktor. Bagi bidang multimedia, ia dirasakan lebih sukar memandangkan pelajar harus menjalankan aktiviti atau tugasan yang bersifat teknikal dan praktikal. Proses merekabentuk memerlukan kepada konsultasi berterusan untuk mencapai objektif kursus. Kajian ini dijalankan dalam tempoh Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan Pemulihan (PKPP) di Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor (KUIS). Responden terdiri daripada pelajar program sarjana muda Pendidikan dengan Multimedia, Usuluddin dengan Multimedia, Bahasa Arab dengan Multimedia dan program Multimedia Kreatif yang mengambil kursus Rekabentuk Grafik dalam silibus mereka. Pelajar diberi penyataan berkaitan bahan pembelajaran, kaedah pembelajaran dan kelengkapan pembelajaran yang mencakupi aspek perisian, perkakasan dan capaian internet. Data yang diperolehi dianalisis untuk mengenalpasti persepsi pelajar terhadap perjalanan sesi pembelajaran kursus Rekabentuk Grafik. Ini bagi memastikan sesi pembelajaran secara dalam talian ini dapat dilakukan secara praktis dan efektif.
The Covid-19 pandemic has implications on human lives around the world in the course of daily affairs. New norms are implementing in all sectors, and it also involves the field of higher education. The Movement Control Order (MCO), among others, does not allow learning sessions to be conducted face to face. Thus it caused institutions of higher learning to take steps to implement the online learning method. As a result, it affects lecturers and students as meetings through virtual are not as smooth as face to face ones. Occasionally there are disruptions to internet access and hardware used. Although interaction via video can be doing directly, it cannot explain all questions clearly. There are suggestions that learning materials be provided by recording with mediums such as Google Classroom and Telegram to enable students to follow the sessions at a suitable time. According to some reports, Malaysia is not considered ready to offer a fully online learning system due to several factors. In the multimedia field, it is more difficult as students have to carry out activities or assignments that involve technical and practical skills. The design process requires ongoing consultation to achieve course objectives. The study took place during the Recovery Movement Control Order (RMCO) at the International Islamic University College of Selangor (KUIS). Respondents consisted of students of the undergraduate program of Education with Multimedia, Usuluddin with Multimedia, Arabic with Multimedia and Creative Multimedia program who took Graphic Design course in their syllabus. Statements related to learning materials, learning methods and learning equipment that involve software, hardware and internet access included in a survey. The data obtained were analyzed to identify students' perceptions towards learning sessions of the Graphic Design course. It is to ensure that the online learning session can be practically and effectively implemented.
Downloads
References
Adnan, A.S. et al (2019). Research Design on Visual Perception of Interface Design of e-learning. Retrieved 28 October, 2020, from http://fstm.kuis.edu.my/myjict/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/paperID-036-pp7-16.pdf
Ahmad, A. (2020). Cabaran Mengajar Dalam Talian. Retrieved 10 September, 2020, from https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/76874/BERITA/Nasional/Cabaran-mengajar-dalam-talian.
A.Rashid, N., Ying, B.P., Syed Ahmad, S.F., Wan Hassan, W.K (2012). Teknologi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Edisi Kemaskini. Oxford Fajar. 39-40.
Bernama (2018). Malaysia Fokus Capaian Internet. Retrieved 28 October, 2020, from https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/malaysia-fokus-capaian-internet-di-seluruh-negara-jailani-168893.
Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 167–175.
Brook, C., & Oliver, R. (2003). Online learning communities: Investigating a design framework. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 139-160. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/brook.html
Churches, A. (2008). Bloom's Taxonomy Blooms Digitally. Retrieved from www. https://www.techlearning.com/news/bloom39s-taxonomy-blooms-digitally
Creswell, J.W. & Guetterman, T.C. (2019). Educational Research. Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualtitative Research. Sixth Edition. Pearson Education Inc. 385-388.
De la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Enhancing Online Distance Education in Small Rural US Schools: A Hybrid, Learner-Centred Model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(4), 35–46.
Farinella, J. A., Hobbs, B. K., & Weeks, H. S. (2000). Distance delivery: The faculty perspective. Financial Practice and Education, 10, 184–194.
Gratton-Lavoie, C., & Stanley, D. (2009). Teaching and learning principles of Microeconomics online: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Economic Education, 40(1), 3–25.
Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. R. (2007). Challenging e-learning in the university : a literacies perspective. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
Kim, K., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The survey says. Educause Quarterly, 29(4), 22.
Koller, D. and Ng, A., 2014. MOOCs and Technology to Advance Learning and Learning Research. Ubiquity Symposium.
Lorenzetti, J. (2013.). Academic Administration - Running a MOOC: Secrets of the World’s Largest Distance Education Classes - Magna Publications.
Lorion, R. P., & Newbrough, J. R. (1996). Psychological sense of community: The pursuit of a field's spirit. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 311-314.
MDEC (2018). Why Malaysia’s Creative Sector A Credible Driver For The Digital Economy. Retrieved 28 October, 2020, from https://mdec.my/blog/?p=83
Morris, W. (2006). Creativity: Its Place in Education. Future Edge Ltd. Retrieved online http://www.jpb.com/creative/Creativity_in_Education.pdf
MQA (2011). Standard Multimedia Kreatif. Dikemaskini pada 2015, 1-11.
Nguyen, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol. 11(2).
Noble, I & Bestley, R. (2005). Visual Research, An Introduction to Research Methodologies in Graphic Design. AVA Publishing, UK.
Northcote, M., 2008. Sense of place in online learning environments. In: ascilite 2008. Melbourne.
Pape, L. (2010). Blended Teaching & Learning. School Administrator, 67(4), 16–21.
Rahman, S. & Mahamod, Z. (2017). Kreativiti dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Penerbit UKM. 27-29.
Reitz, J. (2020). Perception. Retrieved 28 October, 2020, from https://www.iedunote.com/perception
Kashyap, D. (2016). Perception: Meaning, Definition, Nature and Importance. Retrieved from www.YourArticle.Library.com
Sabran, S. (2020). Cabaran Mengajar Dalam Talian. Retrieved 10 September, 2020, from https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/76874/BERITA/Nasional/Cabaran-mengajar-dalam-talian
Sefertzi, E. (2000). Creativity. Report produced for the ECfunded Project. Dlm. Rahman, S. & Mahamod, Z. Kreativiti dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Penerbit UKM. 27-29.
Smaldino, S.E., Lowther, D.L., Mims, C. (2019). Instructional Technology & Media for Learning. Twelfth Edition. Pearson Education Inc. 26-27.
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart T. I. (1993). Investing in Creativity, Psychological Inquiry, 4(3): 229-232.
Tamm, S.(2019). Disadvantages-of-e-learning. Retrieved 6 September, 2020, from https://e-student.org/disadvantages-of-e-learning/
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press. Dlm. Rahman, S. & Mahamod, Z. Kreativiti dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Penerbit UKM. 27-29.
Torrance, E. P. (1987). Teaching for Creativity. Dlm. Rahman, S. & Mahamod, Z. Kreativiti dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Penerbit UKM. 27-29.
Yahya, A., Voo, P., Maakip, I., A.Malek, M.D. (2017). Kaedah Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan. UPSI. 272.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ahmad Syukri Adnan, Rafiza Kasbun, Mohammad Imran Ahmad (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
