Pemikiran Reka Bentuk dalam Aplikasi Pendidikan: Inovasi bagi Meningkatkan Kognitif Murid Bermasalah Pembelajaran
Design Thinking in Educational Applications: Innovations to Enhance the Cognition of Students with Learning Difficulties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/myjict10-1-192Keywords:
Pemikiran Reka Bentuk, Teknologi Pendidikan, Masalah Pembelajaran, Kebolehgunaan, KebolehcapaianAbstract
Kajian lepas telah membuktikan bahawa kegagalan menguasai pembelajaran dalam kelas membawa kesan negatif terhadap keyakinan diri dan pencapaian akademik murid. Kesukaran dalam mempelajari sesuatu seringkali dikaitkan dengan kekurangan keupayaan kognitif dan intelek murid dan seterusnya dikategorikan sebagai masalah pembelajaran. Masalah pembelajaran tidak kekal tetapi boleh menjadi kekal jika tidak diatasi dengan sokongan dan intervensi yang bersesuaian dari awal. Satu strategi khusus diperlukan bagi membantu golongan terpinggir ini. Justeru itu, integrasi antara pemikiran reka bentuk dan pemusatan murid perlu dalam pembangunan alat pendidikan berkesan terutama penggunaan aplikasi. Ini bagi memenuhi pelbagai keperluan pembelajaran murid masalah pembelajaran melalui penyelesaian yang inovatif yang menekankan kekuatan murid secara unik kerana setiap permasalahan yang dihadapi oleh murid adalah berbeza. Rangka kerja pemikiran reka bentuk penting bagi pembangunan dan menguji aplikasi pendidikan ini. Kaedah yang digunakan adalah melibatkan temubual, pemerhatian, mentakrifkan masalah teras, menghasilkan idea penyelesaian yang berpotensi, membuat prototaip aplikasi, dan menguji mereka dalam persekitaran pendidikan sebenar. Hasil kajian menunjukkan potensi teknologi pendidikan yang direka dengan baik untuk menyokong murid yang pelbagai dan mewujudkan persekitaran pembelajaran yang lebih inklusif. Kajian ini menyumbang kepada bidang teknologi pendidikan dengan menunjukkan keberkesanan pendekatan pemikiran reka bentuk dalam membangunkan alat yang berkesan untuk murid yang mempunyai masalah pembelajaran. Ia juga menekankan kepentingan kritikal kebolehcapaian dan reka bentuk berpusatkan pengguna dalam aplikasi pendidikan.
Downloads
References
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2016). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educating for a digital future: The challenge of AI in learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 123-136.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.
Bishop, D. V., & Snowling, M. J. (2016). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 142(6), 1393-1430.
Bower, M. (2017). Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating design thinking, learning outcomes, and digital experiences. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(3), 233-253.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews. Sage.
Brown, T. (2019). Change by design: How design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Harper Business.
Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2020). Destination, imagination, and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 675-692.
Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., & Singh, S. (2018). Interactive technologies to support students with intellectual disabilities in the classroom: A multisite case study. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 23-37.
Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (2017). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. Routledge.
Hatchuel, A. (2018). Design theory and collective creativity: A sociotechnical approach to innovation in education. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(4), 413-423.
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153.
Henriksen, D., & Richardson, C. (2019). Designing for creativity in the face of challenges: A framework for a design-based approach in education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 173-182.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Mace, R. (2019). Universal design in education: Principles and practices. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 9(2), 117-131.
McArthur, G. M., Filardi, N., Francis, D. A., Boyes, M. E., & Badcock, N. A. (2016). Self-concept in poor readers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(5), 586-595.
Ok, M. W., Kim, W., & Shim, J. Y. (2020). Interactive mobile apps and students with disabilities: Supporting academic learning and social interaction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(3), 3-13.
Pal, J., & Vanijja, V. (2020). Bridging the digital divide: Understanding differences in students' proficiency with digital platforms in educational settings. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2009-2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10236-5
Parsons, S. (2017). Learning to work together: Designing a multi-user virtual reality game for social collaboration and perspective-taking for children with autism. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 583-593.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2017). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.
Sahin, A. & Ozenc, E.G. (2021). The Use of Educational Software in Teaching Initial Reading and Writing. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 373-389. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.23
Salinas, M., & Johri, A. (2020). Digital equity in education: The role of technology and design in learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(2), 379-398.
Seale, J. (2017). Improving accessibility to learning in higher education. Routledge.
Smith, R., & Alty, J. (2021). Addressing cognitive diversity: A new approach to inclusive education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-15.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Smith, J. P., & Brown, K. A. (2021). Interactive Technologies in Special Education: The Impact on Student Achievement. TechTrends, 65(2), 163-172
Vlachogianni, P., & Tselios, N. (2022). Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 392-409
White, H. S., & Gardner, M. (2023). Implementing user-centered design in educational technology for special needs students: A participatory approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10123-7
Yenduri, G., Kaluri, R., Rajput, D S., Lakshmanna, K., Gadekallu, T R., Mahmud, M., & Brown, D. (2023). From Assistive Technologies to Metaverse—Technologies in Inclusive Higher Education for Students With Specific Learning Difficulties: A Review. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 11, 64907-64927. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3289496
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Malaysian Journal of Information and Communication Technology (MyJICT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
